They who control the spice, control the universe
2 min read
If you weren't already aware, there is a campaign for replacing Andrew Jackson on the United States twenty-dollar bill, and replacing him with a historically-significant woman. The "Women on Twenties" campaign held a poll, and Harriet Tubman won out over Eleanor Roosevelt and Rosa Parks. The campaign got significant traction and then the Treasury Secretary came out and decided to "spark debate" on the matter by suggesting that the ten-dollar bill get a woman. He then doubled-down on the assertion that since the ten was already up for a redesign they could get the job done faster (released in 2020)... and then suggested that rather than completely remove historically-significant Hamilton (the nominal father of the Federal Reserve system, the Bank of the United States), that whichever woman they selected would share half the currency with Hamilton.
The campaigners were surprised to get only half of what they asked for, and that they had to share it.
But the worst part was that they had chosen Jackson for a reason: He was a jerk of a president (especially to Native Americans) and was opposed to paper currency... so that he was featured on the second-most-famous and most widely-circulated bill is sort of an affront to his own legacy. Many people have spoken out on this, most famously Ben Bernanke, former Chairman of the Federal Reserve.
For his historical significance as the first Secretary of the Treasury, and an advocate of a Bank of the United States, Keep Alexander Hamilton on the ten-dollar bill. And for crying out loud, drop Jackson and put someone more deserving on the twenty.
(For Reference, this is the post I lamented about loosing earlier. I found it!)
1 min read
It's funny, the person in Mauritius who has my Gmail account associated with their facebook account is getting emails asking them if they know my friends in America. While it's possible, hopefully my friends who are getting asked if they know this person in Mauritius are blocking them as spam as well.
1 min read
A few people have recently asked me why I left facebook. Mostly, it was because I was compulsively checking it for no real reason. Yes, I miss out on the heartwarming stories that people post, and I miss out on hearing what my friends are doing in places far and near. But I also miss out on tracking cookies, being an outlet for advertising, and siloing my data in Facebook's vaults.
Mostly, I've decided to implement the #indieweb. This is a set Principles which I think the web is missing out on. Yes, social media has a method of getting into your life, and I'm trying to back out of that invasiveness. So if I blog, I blog here first, then syndicate out to other aggregators later (if ever). I may move from this solution to another one which better integrates my current silos (tumblr and twitter), or return to the days of my PHP coding life where I tried to write my own forums from scratch (probably not).
We'll see how this works out.